Introduction
HOW THIS "WEBBOOK"
CAN BE USED
HOW THIS "WEBBOOK"
CAME INTO BEING
THE
OCONNOR TECHNIQUE (TM) IS BASED
UPON THE NOVEL UNDERSTANDING THAT THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY
OF BACK AND NECK PAIN ORIGINATES FROM MECHANICAL SPINAL
PROBLEMS IN WHICH DISC MATERIAL HAS BEEN PHYSICALLY DISPLACED.
THE BOOK AND THIS WEBSITE OF THE SAME NAME, MAKING
YOUR BAD BACK BETTER with The
O'Connor Technique (tm), How You Can Become Your
Own Chiropractor, by William
T. O'Connor, Jr., M.D.,
DESCRIBES METHODS BY WHICH BACK PAIN SUFFERERS,
THEMSELVES, CAN IDENTIFY THE NATURE OF THEIR PROBLEM,
PHYSICALLY RELOCATE THE DISPLACED DISC MATERIAL, AND PREVENT
IT FROM DISLOCATING AGAIN. IN ESSENCE, THE
READER/USERS CAN BECOME THEIR OWN "CHIROPRACTORS"
BY PERFORMING VARIOUS "MANEUVERS," WHICH
CONSIST OF SIMPLE-TO -PERFORM, GENTLE, BODY MOVEMENTS
IN SPECIFIC POSTURES AND SEQUENCES. BY SO DOING,
THE DISPLACED DISC MATERIAL CAN BE RETURNED TO ITS NORMAL,
ANATOMICAL POSITION, THEREBY RELIEVING THE ATTENDANT PAIN.
IN ESSENCE, COUNTLESS SPINAL PAIN SUFFERERS WHO RECOGNIZE
THAT THEIR BACK IS PAINFULLY "OUT" CAN BE TAUGHT
TO PUT IT RAPIDLY BACK "IN" WITH SURPRIZINGLY
LITTLE EFFORT.
THIS INTERNET WEBSITE CONSISTS OF
A MODIFIED DERIVATIVE PRESENTATION OF THE ORIGINAL
BOOK, MAKING
YOUR BAD BACK BETTER, SO AS TO MAKE
THE METHOD AVAILABLE TO LARGER NUMBERS OF PEOPLE WHO DO
NOT HAVE THE TIME OR INCLINATION TO ACQUIRE OR STUDY A
BOOK. NEVERTHELESS, THE AUTHOR RECOMMENDS THAT VIEWERS
OBTAIN THEIR OWN
COPY OF THE BOOK BECAUSE IT CONTAINS A GREAT
DEAL OF INFORMATION IN A FORMAT THAT IS BETTER STUDIED
AND RETAINED FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.
THIS SEMANTIC WEBSITE PRESENTATION, "WEBBOOK,"
WAS DESIGNED TO GIVE THE VIEWERS AN OPPORTUNITY TO
DETERMINE, WITHOUT COST, IF THEIR BACK PAIN APPEARS TO
BE DISC-RELATED BEFORE PURCHASING SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS
ON HOW TO ALLEVIATE THE PAIN. ALSO, FREELY PRESENTED
IS A TREATISE ON BACK PAIN WHICH PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW
OF THE TOPIC, THE CURRENT
STATE OF BACK PAIN MANAGEMENT IN MEDICAL PRACTICE
TODAY, AN ANATOMICAL DISCUSSION
OF THE NATURE OF SPINAL PAIN, AND A MORE ELABORATE DESCRIPTION
OF WHAT THE O'CONNOR
TECHNIQUE (tm) OFFERS RELATIVE TO OTHER
BACK PAIN PROGRAMS OR AVAILABLE THERAPIES.
THE READER OR USER OF THIS WEBSITE IS GIVEN
THE OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN A GREAT DEAL ABOUT BACK PAIN
WITHOUT CHARGE. THERE IS A WEALTH OF INFORMATION
PRESENTED HEREIN; HOWEVER, THOSE SECTIONS THAT CONTAIN
PROPRIETARY INFORMATION, CONSISTING OF WHAT THE AUTHOR
UNDERSTANDS TO BE INFORMATION AVAILABLE NO WHERE ELSE
IN THE MEDICAL LITERATURE, CAN ONLY BE OBTAINED AT A COST.
WHEN AN ATTEMPT IS MADE TO ACCESS THAT INFORMATION,
THE READER WILL BE ASKED TO REGISTER
WITH A CREDIT CARD PAYMENT PRIOR TO GAINING ACCESS TO
THOSE SECTIONS. ALTERNATIVELY, THE ORIGINAL BOOK
IN ITS ENTIRETY CAN BE PURCHASED BY CREDIT CARD OR MAIL.

HOW
THIS "WEBBOOK" CAN BE USED
If you suffer from spinal pain, the best
way to use this website is to start with the HOME PAGE.
Look at the sidebar for topics that address your situation.
If you select TEST YOURSELF,
you will have the option of beginning your treatment with
a written SELF TEST. If
you suffer from back pain, backache, or neck pain, this
will help you determine if your problem can most likely
be helped by this method so you may find relief as soon
as possible, without having to read other, irrelevant
topics. You can also freely browse around by reading the
topics on the home page listing
that attract your interest. There, by design, the
user is introduced to an overview of the "webbook's"
(website/book's) offerings.
The most expedient means is to start
at the BOTTOM OF
THE HOME PAGE then follow the links from the prompts.
First, you will be directed to the written SELF-TEST
as an optional start. Here, the presumption made
is that the browser came to this site because of a personal
back or neck pain problem; and the goal is to find relief
as soon as possible. Since there are numerous causes
for back pain, it seems only fair and reasonable for the
reader to immediately determine if their type of pain
is consistent with the type of pain The
O'Connor Technique (tm) is designed to address;
therefore, taking the written SELF-TEST
and finding a majority of the answers correlating with
the spectrum of pain the browser is experiencing should
convince the reader that this website/book is addressing
their type of back or neck pain. Additionally, to
make a more accurate effort to insure the reader can be
helped by The O'Connor
Technique (tm) an actual, objective, physical
test (THE
O'CONNOR TEST) is offered immediately upon completion
of the subjective test to further convince the reader
that they have come to the right place for relief.
If that physical test is positive, the back
pain sufferer should be reassured that their pain will
be addressed by the concepts and therapeutic modalities
of The O'Connor
Technique (tm); and they will be convinced
to purchase a membership. At that point, there are
two basic options. One can:
1) Continue with reading the website
like a book (a "webbook") in the following
order:
INTRODUCTION
BACK PAIN IN CONTEXT
PHYSICAL REALITY
DIAGNOSING DISC DISEASE,
PRINCIPLES
and, then, at any time, go to the most appropriate SPINAL
PAIN MANEUVERS
or
2) Take a fast track to their pain
relief by following the prompts after the tests to proceed
directly to the MANEUVERS Section
where they will be registered and then directed to an
image map to identify their site of pain on a diagram
of the human back. Whereupon they will be automatically
routed to the ideal MANEUVERS
(set of physically therapeutic movements to take away
the pain) that best address their particular problem.
Once the MANEUVERS are presented, it is
suggested that the reader download or print them
for a working copy. Most non-medically educated
persons might instantly be bewildered by alot of new terms
and concepts. Do not be intimidated by the
implied complexity of this information nor act under the
assumption that its concepts will require too much new
learning in the absence of a guarantee for absolute benefit.
The O'Connor
Technique (tm) is really not that difficult to
understand; and, after taking the TEST
YOURSELF test and performing THE
O'CONNOR TEST, if it sounds like yours is the type
of pain being described, you shouldn't mind the inconvenience
of learning something new because your probability of
benefiting is so high. Nevertheless, this
concern is addressed by providing the reader with definitions
(in a downloadable PDF format) of the unique concepts
(PRINCIPLES) which can be
acquired through links on the Table of Contents in the
PRINCIPLES Sections which, by selecting, will take the
reader to the indicated definition. Also, there is a section
that elaborates on anatomical terminology (SPINAL
ANATOMY). These sections can be printed or downloaded
for future repeated reference. It is recommended
that the PRINCIPLES Section
be downloaded and kept available to anyone trying to accomplish
a MANEUVER
It is anticipated that the browser, upon
reaching the REGISTRATION
page, might be reluctant to spend the money to purchase
something "sight-unseen." I understand
that hesitation; so, if this concern befalls you, I would
encourage you to read the INTRODUCTION in its entirety
as well as the other "free" components of the
"webbook." Doing that, you should
be convinced that this information is potentially of extreme
value to you personally and be willing to take the chance.
By comparison, the cost to obtain this information is
equivalent to the price of a pre-schooler's talking book.
If you can't spend that amount on yourself in hopes of
relieving an otherwise perpetual pain problem, then you
are selling yourself short.
Even for the "normal"
back, this information can be of immense value
in keeping it that way. Barring some unforseen accident,
anyone fore-armed with the knowledge of the spinal mechanical
principles put forth in this website can expect to never
suffer from back pain. However, if your back was normal
you wouldn't have sought out this website in the first
place; yet that does not limit the back pain sufferer
who wishes to prevent the same fate from befalling their
children or loved ones from passing this information on
in a preventative manner. So, in the broadest sense, this
information is potentially beneficial for everyone. Nevertheless,
if you have proceeded this far, you can safely operate
under the assumption that the probabilities are decidedly
in favor of your pain and stiffness being relieved.
Despite this webbook's length, The
O'Connor Technique (tm) does not purport to be
a cure-all for all forms of back pain, nor does this website
describe all the information I have acquired or that is
available on spinal pain. Such would be beyond its scope
and my intent, not to mention making a dry subject even
more exhaustive and tiresome. Let's face it, back pain
literature doesn't lend itself to enjoyable reading. Too,
it is not intended to be the final word or an all-encompassing
academic and research-oriented treatise on the spine.
There are other medical textbooks that cover the general
subject of back pain more fully and several back pain
books available for non-medical people that lead the reader
to believe that they provide such a service. None of them
contain the presentation you will read herein.
This webbook was designed to provide
a simple, yet competent description of what has previously
been regarded as a mysteriously complex problem. When
understood, any reader of average intelligence should
be able to perform this physically manipulative method,
on themselves, to improve their own back pain.
These physical manipulations are called "MANEUVERS"
because that is the classic term used in Western medicine
to describe any intentionally planned movement which represents
an alteration of human anatomical position.
The length of the book/website relative
to how much you actually must read is misleading. A
person can realistically satisfy their own necessity by
reading only a relatively small portion. You
may be relieved to know that much of the actual instructions
in this website (the MANEUVER
sections) are dedicated to specific regions of the spine
that are painful for one set of patients yet are probably
normal in others. If a reader's particular pain
is located in the low back, that should be the area of
pertinence that the individual need focus on, to the exclusion
of the exhaustive descriptions of how to perform MANEUVERS
on other regions of the spine. After all, if
you don't have neck or thoracic pain, pouring over those
areas' details is not an efficient use of time.
The extent of MANEUVER
directions mostly satisfies my need to provide as maximally
accurate a description as feasible of what movements and
positions the reader needs to accomplish with precision;
so, it is often repetitive. This is intentional. It
was not meant to be read like a novel; and no one is expected
to read every part, unless they have pain in every region
of their spine.
Additionally, if you find one MANEUVER is
successful, you needn't learn all the other MANEUVERS
dedicated to the same spinal region unless you wish to
increase your armamentarium. Many patients of mine are
satisfied with simply learning one MANEUVER because their
back pain events are so few and far between. Others, whose
pain episodes are frequent or whose discs are particularly
damaged need to learn a repertoire of MANEUVERS for "all
occasions." If, after performing the first MANEUVER
in the particular series proves unsuccessful or you wish
to expand your ability to manage more frequent events
in different settings and different manners, then it is
recommended that you should learn more.
Feel free to skip through sections
of the webbook. Simply because the most important
Sections, the "MANEUVERS"
Sections, fall in a particular order, do not feel
that you have to read the website/book like a mathematics
course from start to finish. If you have only Low Back
(Lumbar) pain, you need not enter the Thoracic and Cervical
Sections. In fact, if you follow the ques, you will be
directed there preferentially. If your pain is located
only in the low back and you are reading the webbook
like a conventional book, you can feel free to go directly
to the Chapter referencing LUMBAR (LOW BACK) PAIN MANEUVERS
after the PRINCIPLES
Section; and, if you choose, simply elect to try
a MANEUVER pertinent to your particular
condition immediately as your first action.
If it works for you and relieves your back pain, then
that technique may be the limited extent to which you
wish to engage spinal pain mechanics and all you really
need. However, I recommend that you familiarize
yourself with the relevant PRINCIPLES, first, so you know
why you are performing the movements. If you are
unfamiliar with the anatomy or nomenclature used in this
work, you can freely access or return to the section on
PHYSICAL REALITY to become
educated in those concepts.
For ease of use in this "webbook",
an image map was created to direct the user to the most
appropriate types of MANEUVERS based upon the reader's
pain location. By pointing and clicking
the site that most closely correlates with the pain, the
user is automatically directed to the relevant MANEUVERS.
However, you must first register before being allowed
access to these and other important regions of the website.
The first MANEUVER of each section
was placed at the beginning due to its intrinsic ease
balanced against successfulness. For neck pain, one can
go directly to the section dedicated to CERVICAL (NECK)
PAIN MANEUVERS and do the first neck MANEUVER. For
pain in the Thoracic region related to the back, go to
the section on THORACIC (CHEST) PAIN MANEUVERS.
If relief is instantaneous and you are satisfied with
that, you needn't pour through the whole treatise. If
you can do the MANEUVER effectively, you needn't bother
with all the theory, mechanics, or anatomy unless you
wish to gain a deeper insight into your back pain and
the reason why the MANEUVER
worked. As expected, if you are unfamiliar with some of
the terms you encounter, you can always back up to the
Sections in the website that cover those topics. I wrote
it in a manner that accommodates that style of reading,
assuming that if I relied upon the reader's mastery of
the antecedent nomenclature too heavily the practical
value of the work would be lost to the average, non-physician,
reader.
By reading the section of the website dedicated
to the PRINCIPLES common to
various MANEUVER actions, you will understand what is
happening during the MANEUVERS and better understand the
actions relative to what is happening to your back when
you make certain specific movements. However, it is not
absolutely necessary that you understand them, you can
still perform the MANEUVERS
without this underlying justification. Largely, the supportive
information is provided for those readers who are assisted
by theoretical concepts and logical understandings during
the learning process.
Too, assuming that the reader's time is
valuable, an efficient, time-and-effort conserving means
was provided to give the reader an opportunity to determine
whether they want to expend the effort to read the whole
work. You may think that it is too much of an inconvenience
to read a book attempting to teach you something that
appears so complicated that you may never understand it;
but you shouldn't feel intimidated. It really
is not all that complicated; and it was designed
to be as understandable and readable as possible for lay
persons. If some of the MANEUVERS seem overly complex
at first, go slow and pay attention to the pictures. For
the descriptive text, it may help to have someone read
it to you while you go through the motions. Of course,
this should be someone who legitimately cares about your
welfare or has a vested interest in "making
your bad back better."
Rest assured, it probably will not
be necessary for you to attempt to master all or a majority
of the MANEUVERS,
although it is recommended that one read the entire MANEUVER
description before attempting it. One MANEUVER
usually does the trick if it is the right one for your
particular problem. Chances are that the first
MANEUVER in the section that concerns you will work; however,
if one doesn't work, you can try the next. Similarly,
if you can't perform one MANEUVER for some reason, there
are multiple other options given. No expensive devices
are needed.
I understand the necessity for this strategy
because I got a dose of reality when one patient I had
wasn't getting relief despite my repetitive description
of MANEUVERS designed for a bed or couch. Despite being
well-dressed, urbane, and articulate, it turned out that
he had lost all his furniture when he had to quit work
due to his back injury; but was too embarrassed to reveal
his new level of poverty. As I instructed him in one MANEUVER
he could do on the floor, an audible movement of the disc
material was heard, he obtained instant relief during
the demonstration, and left the office tearfully joyous
and grateful.
In designing this website, I felt compelled
to give as much a reason for why the
method works as I was to teach the reader how
to make it work; but that doesn't mean you have to know
or memorize it. If the reasoning why
this method works and the anatomical nomenclature is not
of interest to you and all you care about is "the
bottom line," you can elect to pass over the majority
of the beginning chapters of this website. If you later
run into something you don't understand, you can go back
to the section in the website that deals with that subject
and acquire whatever information you need to understand
the process. There is usually a chapter heading for every
concept with which the average person can be assumed to
be unfamiliar.
In practical application, when I have a
patient in pain, I usually give a brief description of
the injury, pain, and resolution mechanism, then I teach
them how to do the most appropriate MANEUVER.
Usually that is sufficient, and it only takes me about
thirty minutes to educate them in how they can get themselves
out of pain. They do not need to be articulately educated
as to the anatomy and physiology of disc units to understand
how to solve their problem.
Just as my patients with low back pain needn't
learn about the neck, it is inefficient to spend the time
teaching them those MANEUVERS or waxing poetic on the
supportive theory and mechanics. However, if you have
the time and penchant, learning a little extra never hurt
anyone. By gently trying a MANEUVER intended for another
not particularly painful region of the spine, you may
find a stiffness relieved that has been present so long
that it no longer is recognized by the mind as a problem,
yet when the MANEUVER is accomplished, you may recognize
a new, more comfortable, feeling and an increased range
of motion that you never realized you had previously lost.
Among other things, this website does serve as an excellent
USER'S MANUAL FOR THE
SPINE.
If you are experiencing back pain
for the first time or are in a particularly painful period,
it would behoove you to go directly to the section on
ACUTE PAIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
in the ANCILLARY TOPICS
CHAPTER for the immediate management of a back injury
or acute exacerbation of pain.
Performing these MANEUVERS is in no way
dangerous nor inappropriate for a normal, non-painful,
disc or spine. There also exists a rational understanding
encompassing the damaged spine that, if your spine
is so damaged that it cannot do simple, non-forceful MANEUVER-type
movements that would reasonably be expected to be accomplished
in a normal lifestyle, then you would probably be harmed
anyway or caused to have surgery when you unconsciously
made equivalent movements during your activities of daily
living. Nevertheless, a DISCLAIMER
is incorporated so that it is made clear at the outset,
before any money changes hands, that the user/reader must
assume all liability and risk for practicing the techniques.
There is an advantage to understanding and
applying all the concepts in this website. You
can expect to become a "back pain mini-expert"
in your own right. You may be able to "play
doctor" by introducing others to the information,
or do parlor tricks and be the "life of the party."
Above all, don't part with this information once you are
out of pain. There is an almost certain probability you
will need it again in the future. Even if only your low
back is a problem, there is also a very high probability
that you will eventually have disc pain return later (long
after you have forgotten the MANEUVER directions) or develop
it at other regions of the spine. In that event, you can
turn to those particular MANEUVERS for relief and understand
why I included them all in the same website/book.
IF YOUR PARTICULAR PAIN IS NOT HELPED
BY THE O'CONNOR TECHNIQUE
(TM) OR IF INDEED IT IS AGGRAVATED OR THE PAIN
IS INCREASED, BY ALL MEANS, STOP PERFORMING THE MANEUVERS
OR ACTING UPON THE ASSUMPTION THAT YOUR INDIVIDUAL BACK
PAIN ORIGINATES FROM A SOURCE THAT IS REMEDIABLE FROM
THE INFORMATION IN THIS WEBSITE.
This website is designed to help the majority
of back pain sufferers; it cannot hope to help everyone.
In the event that your pain is worsened, be certain to
seek medical consultation. If you have any doubt, even
before engaging in any exercise program, consult with
your own physician. He/she may understand something about
your particular problem that would require a modification
or discontinuance of the method.
OF PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE, DON'T CONTINUE
DOING ANYTHING THAT INCREASES PAIN. The old adage
"no pain--no gain" or the demand that one "work
through the pain" not only makes no sense but can
result in serious injury if taken to the extreme.
TO
REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF DOING FURTHER DAMAGE TO YOUR
ALREADY DAMAGED SPINE, ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE SUSTAINED
A SIGNIFICANT INJURY OR HAVE SYMPTOMS THAT RESULT IN WEAKNESS
IN THE UPPER OR LOWER EXTREMITIES OR A SEVERE, BURNING,
OR ELECTRICAL-LIKE PAIN THAT SHOOTS DOWN THE LEGS OR ARMS,
GO TO A DOCTOR, GET AN EXAMINATION, AND HAVE HIM/HER GIVE
AN OPINION AS TO WHETHER MOBILIZATION OR EXERCISE IS SAFE
OR NOT. YOU MAY BE EXPERIENCING RADICULAR
PAIN FROM A NERVE THAT IS BEING TRAPPED BY A PROTRUDING
PIECE OF DISC MATERIAL.
The most accurate means to assure that exercise
is safe is by obtaining an NMRI (Nuclear Mass Resonance
Image) to determine if the disc material has escaped the
disc's capsule and is impinging upon a nerve. If such
is the case, performing any movement, including the MANEUVERS
elaborated in this website, has a potential probability
of not working; and the activity may theoretically be
equated with the induction of further harm. Unfortunately,
an NMRI costs over $1000. In lieu of sustaining that economic
burden, you can acquire the clinical experience engendered
in this website which will give you the prerequisite knowledge
necessary to diagnose and treat yourself.
If the MANEUVERS are done correctly as described,
there is little or no opportunity to cause additional
harm because the forces generated are not greater than
those which are generated in predictable normal activity
anyway. Common sense also comes into play here.
IF SOMETHING HURTS MORE WHEN YOU DO IT--YOU STOP. The
MANEUVERS taught in this website should only change the
character of the pain, not substantially increase it.
Any marked increase in severity of pain requires further
diagnostic exploration before proceeding.
Don't get anxious or immobilized
by fear. When I speak of the fear, I suspect
that in most instances it emanates from fear of increasing
the pain and/or fearing that through incompetence you
will make it worse. Addressing the first concern, you
need not fear increasing the pain because this is not
some entity that you have to rise up and confront with
an all-or-none throw of the dice. With The
O'Connor Technique (tm), you are able to try
a certain movement, test it to see if it causes a problem,
if no harm is done, you can go on and test it further
with little increments at a time to reassure yourself
that no greater pain will be experienced.
Many people legitimately fear that they
will be caused pain for no certain benefit. It is this
attitude that keeps people from participating in everything
from chiropractic to the best state of the art University
level medical care--FEAR OF PAIN. There
is no reason to look upon this method in that light. You
can gradually approach this method with non-forced trials
and ease into it without any fear that you will "go
too far" and hurt yourself.
This brings us to the second concern: fear
that, through not knowing what you are doing, you might
end up hurting yourself more. Dispel that fear with your
intellect. Too many people today are programmed to believe
that they are incompetent to make decisions or take actions
related to their own bodies and health. Just as many people
make decisions that are not based upon knowledge but upon
faith. This website neither asks nor expects you to do
either. It only encourages you to understand your fear
and overcome it by your own individual scientific method.
You test a particular movement, if it
hurts--you stop. You substitute your anxiety
with the testing of hypotheses. You will ultimately decide
if it is safe and effective by your outcome.
All things considered, the spine is a pretty
tough structure. It takes substantial forces to truly
damage an intact spine. It is unreasonable to believe
that you would come to any greater harm by gently trying
a few movements you probably would have made anyway during
the course of your future. So, it makes better sense to
try the movements in a controlled atmosphere wherein you
can easily modify any circumstance that would otherwise
be capable of causing you harm.
The opportunity for being helped dramatically
with The O'Connor Technique
(tm) is so great that it is worth taking an exceptionally
small risk, if one exists at all, especially when you
consider that, if the damage to the back is already so
severe as to be increased through these non-traumatic
MANEUVERS, you most likely would have to resort to surgery
regardless of what you did or didn't do. It is highly
unlikely that you are going to break anything unless it
is already too broken to make much of a difference in
the overall outcome . The vast numbers and percentage
of people who, over the years, have reassured me that
the method works in the absence of any damage attributable
to this method, encourages me to relegate the possibility
of further damage to the realm of the theoretical. I mention
the remote possibility of further harm not only for completeness
sake, but to legally protect myself in these litigious
times. I considered not publishing this information out
of fear that someone will be harmed and attribute the
damages to me in a lawsuit. However, the amount of benefit
far overshadows any perceived risk of harm; and to not
publish would lead to much more suffering.
Admittedly, like any other aspect of life,
employing The O'Connor Technique (tm) is not
without risk. So is getting out of bed, swinging with
your head upside down on a swing, or riding an amusement
park ride. We do not live in a perfect world. Of course,
doing the MANEUVERS haphazardly, too rapidly, or attempting
to violently manipulate a damaged disc could result in
further damage.
There are obscure anatomical conditions
that may make this method unsuccessful and even problematic
for some individuals. Sometimes a person, especially if
elderly, can be caused to pass out when their neck is
stretched.This is probably related to the tension placed
on the vertebral arteries that pass through the first
cervical vertebrae. So,
there are an exceedingly small number of persons who may
get light-headed when they attempt the method on their
necks. Of course, the solution is to stop doing it if
light-headedness occurs. It's common sense--if
a particular MANEUVER or position
described in this website causes a problem, don't do it.
Also, there are a certain very low percentage
of people in the population born with separations in the
bridge-like bones that connect the front portion of the
vertebral bones with the back portion called spondylolisthesis
or spondylolysis. This method may not help their back
pain and could aggravate it.
I have no illusions that this particular
method of back pain management will help everyone because
there are an assortment of back pain causes that will
probably not be helped by this method. There are various
musculoskeletal conditions to which anyone can fall prey
such as Spinal Stenosis (a condition where scars or bony
growths close in the canal where the spinal cord or nerves
travel), Sacro-ileitis (an inflammatory condition of the
joint between the pelvic bone and the sacrum), Ankylosing
Spondylitis (an arthritic condition that fuses the vertebral
bones), Good old fashioned arthritis (Osteoarthritis)
of any source, Bursitis, Myositis (muscle inflammation),
Tendinitis (Inflammation of Tendons that join muscles
to bones), Fibrositis or Fibromyalgia (an inflammatory
condition that affects soft tissues surrounding and between
muscles accompanied by fatigue, muscle aches, and morning
stiffness), and last but not least--Fractures.
All of the above could mistakenly be confused
with disc herniation disease; however, most of these pains
are routinely handled by the medicines you will be taking
for inflammation anyway so they, too, will serendipitously
be helped by the complete method I describe. But don't
let the sheer number of these conditions scare you into
believing that a major undertaking will be necessary to
figure out which one you have. By far and away,
the most common source of back pain and the highest percentage
of it is caused by herniated disc disease. Just
because a whole panoply of conditions can cause back pain,
that doesn't change the reality that most probably
you are dealing with a herniated disc condition by virtue
of the preponderant statistical probabilities.
There are other conditions that are the
uncommon causes of pain that appear to be spinal in nature
but are not true spinal pain. They don't relate to musculo-skeletal
causes but fall into a separate category both due to their
rareness and not really being associated with spinal tissue,
per se. A partial list includes: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
(a breaking down and expansion of the largest artery in
the abdomen), Kidney Stones, Kidney infections, Inflammation
of the Pancreas, Stomach Ulcers, Infections of the Uterus
or fallopian tubes, Ectopic Pregnancy, Prostate Inflammations,
Pleural Effusions (Fluid in the Lung Spaces), Colon Obstructions,
Tumors or Cancers of the bone or tissues contiguous with
the back. So uncommon are they, that I can't recall being
fooled making these diagnoses in the past 10 years despite
thousands of patients. In most cases, these diagnoses
are so readily obvious to me, that I think most people
with common sense, when they consider the absence of and
presence of other associated symptoms, will figure out
for themselves that the pain doesn't really originate
in the spine. HOWEVER, IF
THERE IS EVER ANY DOUBT, OBTAIN COMPETENT MEDICAL CONSULTATION
In fact, the pain they cause is
so different and readily distinguishable from disk pain
(by both non-affirmative answers to the TEST
given at the start of this website and by the method I
describe under the heading of "DIAGNOSING
YOUR OWN DISC") that the distinction is usually
obvious. I can even go one step further to say
that if you don't get relief from The
O'Connor Technique (tm) then you may reasonably
suspect that the pain is from some other source and go
searching for an exact diagnosis through the usual and
customary medical channels. However, again, the
majority of spinal pain originates from disc related causes
so don't assume that your best bet is to just
let a doctor manage it. Read this website and
practice the techniques, if they don't work, you can,
therefore, reasonably rule out mechanically treatable
disc disease; and, then, the application of other diagnostic
modalities and expensive imaging studies are more likely
to be cost-effective and productive.
On the other side of the coin, oftentimes
doctors make diagnoses that attribute the pain to muscle
strain, arthritis, ligament tears, etc. when in reality
a herniated disc is really the ultimate source.
Too, a herniated disc can cause muscle spasm and the doctor
is not technically wrong when making the diagnosis of
muscle spasm. However, frequently, the underlying origin
of the problem is the disc and until that mechanical pain
is solved, little or no relief can be expected. The practical
message here is that even if you have been given
an alternative, inadequate, diagnosis, in my experience,
you still could probably be suffering from a herniated
disc. In light of that reality, trying The
O'Connor Technique (tm) can provide the relief you
seek in spite of a previously made, incorrect, diagnosis
.
Far too many of the patients who
come to me already have other diagnoses yet, in reality,
have disc disease as the source of pain. I prove
that contention by "fixing" them right then
and there in the office, but rarely do they go back to
the previous doctor to educate him/her.
This website and these MANEUVERS
are directed to the majority of intervertebral disc pain
sufferers who's damage is not so extensive as to require
immediate surgery or so degenerated as to not have any
functional disc remaining. In fact, once a person has
been examined by a doctor and surgery is ruled out, there
is little other hope for reduction of mechanical pain
except by mechanical solutions. This website provides
those mechanical solutions.
Once you have mastered the mechanical solutions,
you may, at first, as I found necessary, have to use them
on a constantly repetitive basis to get out of pain; but
that small inconvenience is vastly preferable to constant
pain. With time, however, you most likely will discover
that you require exercising the pain-stopping MANEUVERS
less and less. In my case, unless I "over do it"
by too much lifting or sports, I only occasionally have
to perform the MANEUVERS to stop the pain. Over the last
several years, my Lumbar disc pain has drastically been
reduced in frequency and severity. It is my assumption
and belief that my spine has responded to the intentional
alterations in movement and mechanical forces by re-molding
into a more stable and pain-free configuration.
I suspect my autopsy will be the only means of proving
that contention--a prospect that my inevitable critics
will relish.
Lastly, I feel the need to explain that
the illustrations in this website/book are not always
intended to be anatomically exact representations of human
tissues or bio-mechanical actions. As the reader will
learn, a few millimeters of distance at the level of the
disc can mean the difference between pain and non-pain.
The whole spinal disc unit is so small that it can be
easily grasped in the palm of the hand. It is very difficult
to represent comparisons between diagrams that differ
only by a few millimeters of change. Therefore, some exaggeration
of anatomy (especially distance and angles) is often necessary
to convey an adequate understanding of the physical properties
being discussed. I accept that knowledgeable medical professionals
may be critical of these anatomical representations; but
the book /website was not predominately designed for their
use.
The bulk of the illustrations were drawn
by myself, in part because these are new concepts that
have never before been represented and the time and cost
of employing a medical illustrator to give physical form
to my concepts would have been prohibitive. The truth
will out, I am not a world class artist; however, it is
my opinion that it is more important to get the idea across
rather than to stand on anatomical exactitude. However,
this revelation by no means implies that the drawings
do not accurately reflect physical reality because they,
to the best of my understanding and ability, are intended
to do as great a service to reality as to the readers'
back pain.
IF YOU WISH TO CONTINUE, I RECOMMEND THAT
YOU TAKE THE TESTS TO DETERMINE IF YOUR BACK PAIN MOST
LIKELY ORIGINATES IN DISC DISEASE. TO GO
TO THE SECTION WHERE YOU CAN TEST
YOURSELF , CLICK HERE.

HOW
THIS "WEBBOOK" CAME INTO BEING
It could be that Nature's most efficient
means of remedying a painful condition is to afflict a
doctor with it. Speaking from experience, if
I weren't a doctor, I might have been permanently disabled
from my own "bad back," addicted to narcotic
pain medicines, or have undergone a painful, dangerous
surgery without any reasonable certainty that it would
have solved my problem; and, ten years later, I statistically
would have been no better off than not having had the
surgery. Instead, I can lift heavy objects as well as
most of my peers, play most sports, do physical labor,
sleep comfortably, and I am not in constant, incessant,
unrelenting, pain. Most people with "bad backs"
would give almost anything to be able live that reality.
In a sense, the development of The O'Connor Technique
(tm) is more a personal triumph than an academic
achievement because I can function for the most
part without pain; and when pain occurs I can rapidly
stop it. Retrospectively, this triumph is tinged with
a paradoxical tragedy, in that, had I the knowledge I
have now, years ago, when my back first started hurting,
I sincerely believe I could have prevented the damage
I have sustained through ignorance and significantly reduced
the severity of the dreaded degenerative disc
disease. However, this belief is predicated
upon my assumption that I would have followed the appropriate
advice if it had been presented to me.
It is difficult to prove whether I would
have put forth the effort to sufficiently protect my back
without first experiencing the grinding pain of a disc
herniation. I believe I would have because I distinctly
recall, in my teenage years, attempting to seek advice
upon the best posture to prevent the discomfort I was
already, by then, experiencing and can distinctly remember
being told by nearly everyone: "Keep your back straight,"
"Be sure to lift with your knees," "Don't
rock back on your chair, sit up straight," etc. I
did not, then, have the knowledge to understand that straightening
the naturally extended curvature of the Lumbar spine is
physiologically and anatomically disadvantageous,
lifting with the knees is insufficient advice
to prevent lifting damage, and rocking back in a chair
actually helps unload the spine. Adhering
to such traditional advice (as I did) served to aggravate
the problem rather than alleviate it.
The triumph is that coming upon alternative
knowledge, although late, has made my life much more pain-free
and largely has prevented further damage and disability.
This experience has at least convinced the skeptic in
me that even the worst evil has a component of good. Since,
had I not been stricken with this pain, I would not have
been motivated to help eliminate this particular form
of suffering.
I did not set out to write a book
on back pain. The principle impetus for developing
this technique came because I was in pain, and I discovered,
to my dismay, that the pre-existing and currently widespread
"state-of-the-art" back pain management methods
were (and for the most part still are) woefully inadequate.
I was forced by circumstance to apply the adage:
"Physician--Heal Thy Self." Having largely done
so, in the writing of this material, I can share my hard-found
ability to prevent pain and disability by educating people
in the art of arresting back pain whenever it occurs
as well as protecting and strengthening their spines against
future episodes.
The O'Connor Technique (tm)
did not come suddenly in a burst of creative bathtub
genius; rather, it is the product of a physician (myself)
living with a radiographically defined disc herniation
(See Figure 1, showing my actual CAT scan) for greater
than ten years. I suffered debilitating pain
after a flexion injury, was unable to gain any satisfactory
answer as to the cause of the pain or a solution from
my colleagues, and resorted to figuring out the problem
myself by an intensive study of the spine and the existing
available methods for reducing the pain.
In developing The
O'Connor Technique (tm)
and the mechanical solutions to back pain, I started
from the basic anatomy and analyzed it as a mechanical
problem rather than a medical one; then, through
a combination of common sense, a study of what existing
therapies were beneficial in myself, applied intellect,
and good old-fashioned trial-and-error using my own back
as an experimental model, I arrived at an elegantly simple,
perfectly reasonable explanation of the source for what
I discovered was a majority of spinal pain.
Working on myself, experimenting by seeing
which techniques worked and which ones didn't, I was able
to design and refine the most successful methods of putting
my own disc back in place. Later, when I was certain that
the effect was not a delusion, coincidence, or some serendipitous
result from random activity, I began testing the method
on nearly every patient that fit the criteria for a disc
problem in my practice. I soon began to achieve very gratifying
results in others. People were being helped immediately.
They would come into the office bent over, in terrible
pain, and nearly unable to move; then, they would leave
walking upright without the pain. Carefully selecting
patients with disc symptoms upon whom I could test the
technique and very carefully using my technique to re-position
their discs, I became convinced that this constituted
a novel approach to the management of back pain that was
predominately successful. As the technique evolved, more
and more people were getting beneficial results. If one
technique didn't seem to work, I re-examined the problem
and altered the technique so as to be able to fine tune
it to focus upon the specific areas of pain in the back
or neck. I studied what motions and movements were successful
in my own back and neck then utilized them whenever patients
complained of the same symptoms.
I was understandably anxious in the beginning,
after all, the fear of harming people was so much a concern
that, at first, I was reluctant to try it on anyone except
those who were exhibiting the least symptoms with the
lowest probability of having a complete disc protrusion.
The subset of patients in whom any manipulation might
create an increased chance of nerve damage were carefully
screened out from these early trials.
Later, I developed the means to avoid any
active manipulations on my part. I was able to limit the
clinical activity to those motions that the patients could
reasonably have accomplished themselves with normal exercise-type
movements. This insured that I did not induce any harm
that would not have otherwise reasonably been assumed
to have been inevitably occasioned by a return to normal
activity. After I convinced myself that so many people
were being helped and none were being harmed, I began
to use it as a therapeutic trial. Persons with back pain
were quickly assessed to rule out a neurosurgical lesion,
then they were directed through what are later described
in the website as "MANEUVERS." If they got relief,
they could be assumed to only have had a disc as the problem
because that was the only anatomical area being changed
through motion. It came to be so successful and non-traumatic
that, if it didn't give nearly immediate relief, I then
had evidence to conclude that the problem was probably
not disc-related, and I looked for an alternative source
of pathology. Since the pain was so easily remediable
by this method, which only works on the discs, I also
soon found that an extraordinarily high percentage of
back pain was attributable to disc pathology.
In both a literal and figurative sense,
I may have figured out the "combination"
to a "lock" that has kept countless millions
of people imprisoned in pain over the course of centuries.
I make no apologies for the manner in which I arrived
at this revelation. For a time, I was both the researcher
and the principal human subject.
The use of a single patient by an enquiring
mind to scientifically study the anatomical and physiological
responses of humans is certainly not without precedent
in the history of medical inquiry. William Beaumont, an
obscure army surgeon, took advantage of a rare opportunity
to pave the way for the present understanding of the gastric
process. He treated a gunshot wounded patient in 1822;
but the patient was left with a permanent exterior opening
in his stomach. He conducted a long series of experiments
which he assembled in his classic work Experiments
and Observations on the Gastric Juice and the Physiology
of Digestion. His
findings pertaining to digestion made a great contribution
to medical science and are just as valid and relevant
now as when they were first understood.
I also came to the conclusion that the relief
couldn't be sustained without intentionally teaching the
method to patients so that they could practice the principles
on a continuous basis. If I didn't teach them--I had no
way of confirming whether education could sustain the
relief. After several years of personally instructing
patients and observing the results, I was able to prove
to myself that the method could be taught successfully
to the average patient and keep them pain-free--it worked!
1. Lyons AS, Petrucelli
RJ, Medicine An Illustrated History, 1987; Abradale
Press, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. Publishers, New York:504.
2. Pelekanos JT, et al,
Neurology, 1990;40:705-07.